Pricing starts with your bid workflow.
Tell us what your team reviews today. We will scope pricing around your document volume, team size, and workflow needs — not generic seat counts.
Pricing
Start with a pilot. Scale across bid teams.
For teams evaluating Zupien
Pilot
You review transformer bids and want to test Zupien against your current manual process on a real document package.
- Limited project volume
- Core extraction workflow
- Guided setup
- Demo-to-pilot support
For bid desks and proposal teams
Team
Your team handles multiple tenders per month. You need a platform that gives every reviewer the same structured starting point.
- Shared project workspace
- Requirements and risk review
- Checklist workflow
- Exportable reports
For OEMs, utilities, and EPC groups
Enterprise
Your procurement team spans multiple equipment categories and regions. You need Zupien integrated into existing workflows with audit trails and admin controls.
- Custom workflow support
- Taxonomy configuration
- Admin and audit controls
- Priority onboarding
The comparison
Six areas where manual review falls short.
| Area | Manual review today | With Zupien |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first review | 3–5 days per spec book | Structured output in minutes |
| Coverage | Depends on reviewer experience | Every page scanned, every clause classified |
| Traceability | Notes in email or spreadsheet | Source page and clause cited on every item |
| Consistency | Varies across reviewers | Same structured taxonomy applied every time |
| Cross-referencing | Manual, across multiple files | Multi-document package in one workspace |
| Output format | Emails, meetings, tribal memory | Exportable tables, reports, and checklists |
Not sure which fits?
Book a demo and tell us what your team reviews today.
We will recommend the right starting point — and if Zupien is not the right tool, we will say so.
30 min · your documents · no pitch